Before saying you don't think U.S. rulers would kill Americans in a false flag attack, please read "Governments From Around the World ADMIT That They Carry Out False Flag Terror."

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/10/did-george-w-bush-do-all-he-could-to-prevent-911/411175/

A 9/11 "Dog That Didn't Bark" ( Watch this video of President Bush being informed that "America is under attack" and decide for yourself what it reveals.)

Do Americans Buy the Government's 9/11 Story?

Peter Beinart in this Atlantic article, and others such as Sibel Edmonds, have shown that Bush et al refused to take the warnings of an imminent attack by Bin Laden seriously. The question is, why did they refuse to take the warnings seriously? I think the answer can be gleaned from the behavior of Bush's Chief of Staff, Andrew Card, immediately after he whispered into G.W. Bush's ear that a second building had been struck by an airliner (this is on the famous video tape at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rO3F6mZUaE starting at time point 1:07.)

Note that immediately after whispering the message, Card walks away, without waiting to hear what Bush would say to him. Think about this! The Chief of Staff of the nation's Commander in Chief has just told the Commander in Chief that the nation is under attack, and the Chief of Staff does not wait to hear what instructions the Commander in Chief gives him to respond to the attack! And the Chief of Staff is the #1 person who communicates from the President to others in the Executive chain of command! What could possibly explain this strange behavior of Andrew Card?

The most obvious explanation is that the message Card whispered into G.W. Bush's ear was that things are going according to plan. If this were the message there would be no need for Card to wait to hear from Bush what he (Card) should do. Can you think if any other explanation?

Likewise, if some of the 19 Muslims who are now accused of doing 9/11 (without, by the way, a single shred of evidence that would hold up in a court of law, as explained at http://www.newdemocracyworld.org/old/Noevidence.pdf ) were being orchestrated by Bush et al as patsies to be blamed for 9/11, then Bush et al would not want these Muslims to be blocked or interfered with by zealous anti-terrorism employees of the government who were not "in the know," would they?

The 9/11 Toronto Report

Pilot Who Flew The Airplanes That Crashed On 9/11 Blows The Whistle (If you disagree with this pilot, then provide one different pilot with equivalent experience who will publicly deny what this pilot says.)

Scientific Study: Towers Collapsed Due To Controlled Demolition

Video: "9 11 NO PLANES Theory Undeniable Proof!! 2013"

Video: 9/11 Firefighter Blows WTC 7 Cover-Up Wide Open

Here is some compelling evidence that 9/11 was an inside job (just one piece out of many other pieces of evidence). The third building to collapse on 9/11 was World Trade Building #7. It was not hit by a plane or anything else. WT#7 collapsed in a manner that was identical to a controlled demolition. In particular it fell at FREE FALL acceleration for part of its collapse. This is only possible if everything--including the major structural columns--under the part falling at free fall were removed, so as to provide zero resistance to the fall of what was above it. There is no known way of removing these columns except by explosives, placed prior to the collapse. There is no way to place sufficient explosives without being noticed. WT7 contained offices of the CIA, the Secret Service, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) several financial institutions and then-Mayor Giuliani’s Office of Emergency Management. Al Qaeda could not have sneaked the explosives under the noses of these people. It follows that it was an inside job. Here are documents about this: http://www.ae911truth.org/news/215-news-media-events-5-of-6-nist-fraud-5.html and http://www.911truth.org/petition-revise-the-us-government-final-report-on-collapse-of-building-7/ and the U.S. government report itself at http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/factsheet/wtc_qa_082108.cfm .

American Pravda: 9/11 Conspiracy Theories

RON UNZ • SEPTEMBER 10, 2018

• 10,100 WORDS • 425 COMMENTS [This article makes the case that 9/11 was done by Israeli Mossad. But the Israeli and U.S. ruling classes are practically the same thing, as I discuss in my article, "Why U.S. Billionaires Could Destroy the Israel Lobby, But Don't".]

A former senior CIA official says the official 9/11 story is false: click here and here and here.

Video: Incontrovertible--New 9/11Documentary by Tony Rooke

Video: General Albert Stubblebine (the commanding general of the United States Army Intelligence and Security Command from 1981 to 1984) says the official 9/11 story is lie

Video: The Best 9-11 Documentary ++ Media Cover-Up ++ No Planes!!

9/11 Aircraft Airborne Well After Its Supposed Crash

Video: John Kerry admits Building #7 was a controlled demolition

How Science Died at the World Trade Center by Kevin Ryan

"Rainbow in the Dark: Powerful Proof of 9/11 Nukes" posted by Jim Fetzer February 6, 2015

Video: 9/11 firefighter blows WTC 7 cover-8p wide open

Video: 9/11 Scientific proof no plane

Audio: 9/11 Radar deception explained in great technical detail (skip initial music)

Affidavit by a very experienced pilot asserting that the official 9/11 story of the aircraft hitting the World Trade Center buildings is physically impossible

Video: former CIA asset back-channel between Saddaam Hussein and U.S., Susan Lindauer, says that Mohammed Atta was a CIA asset and the hijackers had a lot of technical and other help from the Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld circle. Problem is that there is no evidence whatsoever that Muslims hijacked four planes on 9/11. Lindauer asserts it happened, but does not provide evidence. Her first hand evidence only supports the conclusion that Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld knew in advance of 9/11 that there was going to be an apparent hijacking, and that they wanted to use it as a pretext for invading Iraq.

More Bad Science Surrounding the Nano-Thermite Red Herring

Film: September 11, the New Pearl Harbor

Hijacking America's Mind on 9/11: Counterfeiting Evidence, by Elias Davidsson

The Moral Decoding of 9-11: Beyond the U.S. Criminal State, by John McMurty in Journal of 9/11 Studies

The 9/11 Reader: The September 11, 2001 Terror Attacks (this is a web page with a thorough discussion of why the official 9/11 story is not true)

Video: Mysterious deaths of 9/11 Witnesses

Video: 9/11 The Big Clue Everyone Missed

Former 9/11 Commissioner admits missile hit the Pentagon (but quickly "corrects" himself)

Do Americans Buy the Government's 9/11 Story? by John Spritzler

Highly credible people question 9/11

Video interview of the scientist whose peer-reviewed scientific paper reported nanothermite was used to bring down the WTC buildings.

Video demonstrating that thermite (a primitive version of nanothermite, traces of which were found in the WTC dust) really can cut steel beams, producing the same visual and audible effects that eyewitnesses to the collapse of the World Trade Center towers reported seeing and hearing.

118 Witnesses: The Firefighters Testimony to Explosions in the Twin Towers (pdf), by Graeme MacQueen

Last man out makes shocking 9/11 disclosure, by Richard Roepke [A report of an interview with William Rodriguez, the last person out of the North Tower of the World Trade Center on the day of 9/11, and a decorated hero who saved hundreds of lives, heard explosions in the basement before the plane hit the building and insists 9/11 was an inside job]

Fabricating Terror by Paul Craig Roberts (an Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan Administration)

Left-leaning despisers of the 9/11 truth movement: Do you really believe in miracles? by David Ray Griffin

Did 9/11 justify the war in Afghanistan? by David Ray Griffin

Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe in The Open Chemical Physics Journal 2009

September 23, 2007 Seven CIA Veterans Challenge 9/11 Commission Report by Alan Miller http://www.opednews.com Official Account of 9/11 a “Joke” and a “Cover-up” September 23, 2007 – Seven CIA veterans have severely criticized the official account of 9/11 and have called for a new investigation. “I think at simplest terms, there’s a cover-up. The 9/11 Report is a joke,” said Raymond McGovern, 27-year veteran of the CIA, who chaired National Intelligence Estimates during the seventies. “There are a whole bunch of unanswered questions. And the reason they’re unanswered is because this administration will not answer the questions,” he said. McGovern, who is also the founder of VIPS (Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity), is one of many signers of a petition to reinvestigate 9/11.[1]

Released: September 06, 2007 Zogby Poll: 51% of Americans Want Congress to Probe Bush/Cheney Regarding 9/11 Attacks; Over 30% Seek Immediate Impeachment ; 67% also fault 9/11 Commission for not investigating anomalous collapse of World Trade Center 7. Kansas City, MO (Zogby International) September 6, 2007 - As America nears the sixth anniversary of the world-churning events of September 11, 2001, a new Zogby International poll finds a majority of Americans still await a Congressional investigation of President Bush' and Vice President Cheney's actions before, during and after the 9/11 attacks. Over 30% also believe Bush and/or Cheney should be immediately impeached by the House of Representatives. The 911truth.org–sponsored poll also found that over two-thirds of Americans say the 9/11 Commission should have investigated the still unexplained collapse of the 47-story World Trade Center Building 7 at 5:20 p.m. on September 11, 2001. http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1354

Peer-reviewed journal article: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe. This provides strong evidence that explosives were used to bring down the WTC buildings

An architect explains why the evidence indicates that the WTC was brought down by controlled demolition.

Peer-reviewed journal article presenting the scientific evidence that the WTC was brought down by controlled demolition (i.e. with the explosive known as Thermate.)

There is no evidence that Muslims hijacked planes on 9/11 by Elias Davidsson

9/11 Contradictions: An Open Letter to Congress and the Press Book by David Ray Griffin

National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States

Journal of 9/11 Studies

Architects and Engineers 9/11 Truth

Scholars for 9/11 Truth

250+ 9/11 'Smoking Guns' .

911 Truth Campaign

Patriots Question 9/11